In fact you add another party to your whole DNS resolution game. So there’s little privacy improvements with DoH without SNI being widely used. Went back to the router dhcp and it came back. I set up an isc dhcp server and the problem disappeared. I set adguard as the dns server in the dhcp settings, but all my clients populated with the ip of the router as the dns server, adguard also showed it as the only device making queries. I would say most people are better off using their ISPs peer DNS as upstream since they usually have the better response time and your ISP is aware of your DNS foo anyway. I had this same issue with a linksys router. Place a note that not all routers can be configured by the previous tutorial. Try a couple of setups and test responsetime with tools like namebench or dig The first part will be the same tutorial as we have now.
to ensure local dns resolution, leave the dns service on your router running and add a rule to adguard to forward these requests to the router (usually the device that runs your dhcp can resolve local hostnames) Example rule: Consider having your router use it’s regular peer DNS from your ISP but have your DHCP hand out your local adguard DNS servers to it’s clients. You point your router’s DNS back into your own network. There seems to be a design flaw with your setup which might be the cause of your issue: It can result in better performance while producing more bloat.
Enabling parrallel queries only makes sense if you define more than one upstream.
#Adguard home router windows 10
All my devices connect to my router, and I set the router to have my Windows 10 machine as the DNS server. Now, I want every other machine on my network to use my Windows 10's Adguard Home as a DNS server. However it shouldnt be recognizable by humans, only by numbers. 1 I have Adguard Home installed on my Windows 10 machine (192.168.1.128) and it works perfectly. Using a DoH upstream over regular DNS will be slower in most cases since theres a lot of overhead.
0 kommentar(er)
